
In 1996, lotteries in North America awarded $52 million
in prizes every day thats $36,000 every minute, 24 hours a day. This
didnt just suddenly happen. Lotteries have been around nearly as long as
civilization has been around. People love lotteries.
Lotteries Though History
Way Back There- Lotteries are ancient. Aside from biblical references to casting
lots for reward, the first recorded mentions of draw games in history were those devised
by the Romans. It was common for emperors to give their dinner party guest gifts ranging
from slaves to lavish villas, all awarded as door-prize drawings.
Choosing by lot has been a method of making determinations at least as far back a
biblical times, with the division of the land west of the Jordan among the tribes of
Israel (Numbers 26:55). According to Proverbs 18:18, "The lot puts an end to disputes
and decides between powerful contenders."
Lots also appear in the literature and traditions of Greece, India, China, Japan and
Rome.
Augustus Caesar conducted the first known public lottery for a community cause,
raising funds for repair work in the city of Rome.
1420the French city of LEcluse used lottery to raise money to strengthen
the towns fortifications. Prizes were in the form of goods or commodities.
1466Bruges, Belgium, raised money for the poor.
1520Historians credit King Francis I of France with organizing the first state
lottery, which quickly became an important source of raising royal revenue.
1530La Lotto de Firenza became the first public lottery in Italy, soon followed
by similar drawings in Genoa and Venice.
1560sthe English caught lottery fever when Queen Elizabeth I authorized a state
lottery to restore the nations harbors facilities.
1694the British Parliament began using a state lottery to float a 1-million-pound
loan. Tickets were 10 pounds each and the prizes were in 16-year cash annuities.
1753A lottery raised money to start the British Museum.
1755The first case of the Lotto Mania was reported when eager ticket-buyers broke
down the doors of English ticket offices on opening day.
Lotteries in American History
1612King James I of England raised 29,000 pounds for the Virginia Companys
expeditions to colonize America. In America, the Virginia Company financed the Jamestown
Colony with a lottery.
1665The Dutch held a lottery to raise money for the poor in New Amsterdam, the
predecessor of New York.
1768George Washington sponsored a
lottery to build a road
across the Blue Ridge Mountains.
A lottery sponsored by John Hancock rebuilt Bostons Faneuil Hall after it was
damaged by fire.
Lotteries financed buildings at Harvard and Yale colleges.
By one source, there were about half a dozen respectable lotteries operation in each in
the 13 colonies prior to the American Revolution.
The Continental Congress saw lotteries as a means of financing a Revolutionary Army to
make them independent of England- ironic since to was "taxation without
representation" that was a key complaint of the colonies. Apparently they didnt
see lotteries as a tax.
Benjamin Franklin sponsored a lottery to raise money for cannons to
defend Philadelphia against the British.
It was proceeds from the United States Lottery 1777 that paid for the provisions for
Washingtons troops.
New Mexico Lottery History
- November 1994Constitutional amendment allowing for creation of a lottery was
approved for 54% of New Mexico voters.
- January 1995New Mexico Supreme Court struck down the amendment as a violation of
the state constitution.
- April 1995After New Mexico State Legislature approved, Governor signed law
creating the New Mexico Lottery.
- April 27, 1996New Mexico Lottery launched 23 days ahead of schedule.
- FY96 sales were $28.4 with $6.3 million going to
education. $3.4 million
went to Public School Critical Capital Outlay Fund: $2.3 million went to Lottery Tuition
Fund.
- FY97 sales were $82.1 million, with $21.9 million going to
education. $12.2 Million went to Public School Critical Capital Outlay Fund; $9.7 million went to
Lottery Tuition Fund.
- FY98 sales were $84.9 million, with
$21.2 million going to education. $11.7 Million went to Public School Critical Capital Outlay Fund;
$9.5 million went to
Lottery Tuition Fund.
- FY99 sales were $89.2 million, with
$19.6 million going to education. $11.7 Million went to Public School Critical Capital Outlay Fund;
$9.5 million went to
Lottery Tuition Fund.
Distributions by Public School Critical Capital Outlay Fund:
- $7.2 million distributed January 1997.
- $17.5 million distributed August 1997.
Lottery Success Scholarships Awarded:
- $1.4 million distributed fall 1997.
- 2,149 full tuition scholarships awarded to New Mexico colleges and universities in fall
1997.
Lottery Myths
Myth #1
MythLotteries take advantage of the poorer economic strata of our society. Wrong.
The Washington Post in September 1997
commissioned a poll by Martinez Marketing of St. Louis to find out the facts
about who plays the lottery.
Here are the results:
- Middle income Americans were the most likely group to play the lottery. Two out of three
Americans with household incomes between $25,000 to $45,000 a year play the lottery at
least once a year. One out of four play monthly. Americans earning $45,000 to $65,000 play
even more often, with three of four playing occasionally while one third wager at least
once a month.
On the other hand, the wealthiest and the poorest Americans were least likely to take a
chance on the lottery. Half of those earning less than $25,000 a year said they never
played the lottery, and about half of those earning more than $65,000 a year said they
also never play.
In May, 1997 the New Republic said, "The fact is that the typical lottery player
has some college and many are college graduates with an average household income of about
$35,000. In Atlanta, Georgia, 33% were high school graduates, 21.7% had some college, 25%
had college degrees and 10% had advanced degrees. Also, 28% had incomes between $35,000
and $49,000, and 27% had incomes of $50,000 to $74,000."
In 1996, the New Mexico Department of Health and the University of New Mexicos
Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse and Addictions conducted a survey of the gambling
behavior of New Mexicans. That survey showed that gambling habits were very similar across
lines. Asked if they had gambled in the past month, the percentage breakdown was as
follows:
|
Annual Income Level |
Percent Who Gambled in Past Month |
|
<$10,000 |
44.4% |
|
$10,000 - $24,999 |
44.0% |
|
$25,000 - $49,999 |
42.3% |
|
$50,000 - $74,999 |
49.2% |
|
$75,000 - $99,999 |
49.2% |
|
>$100,000 |
63.0% |
Prevalence of gambling by income levels.
The only trend that leaps out of these numbers is that the higher the income level, the
greater the propensity to gamble. And when asked how many had gambled in the past year,
the same trend held true among the surveys respondents. It certainly does not
indicate that the lower income levels in our citizenry gamble more than the higher levels.
Myth #2
MythThe lottery is a Tax.
Wrong.
People are forced to pay taxes; no one is forced to play the lottery. You can go to
jail or lose your home for not paying taxes. You wont go to jail for not playing
lottery games. You just wont have a chance to win cash and other prizes!
Some people say the lottery is an implicit tax, because it has relatively higher
administrative costs and is less efficient way of raising money for, say, education than
taxes, but its revenues go for education just as other tax money does. Playing the lottery
depletes the players discretionary income from availability for other purchases, but
so do going to the movies, ballgames, or other form of entertainment.
"Lottery agencies are not tax collectors in any normal sense but rather are state
enterprises producing and selling a product to the public
Viewed as a state
enterprise striving to make money, state lotteries appear remarkably successful. Product
innovations and aggressive promotions have generated extraordinary growth, and their legal
monopoly position has made possible a high rate of profit on sales." ("Selling
Hope" by Charles T. Clotfelter and Philip J. Cook, 1991, A National Bureau of
Economic Research Book, p. 219) |